![vectra 3d imaging logo vectra 3d imaging logo](https://www.springridgeplasticsurgery.com/media/vectra-body-animation.gif)
Obi makes full use of it to fully understand your goals as he explains the extremely advanced techniques and technology such as enriched fat transfers, and skin tightening laser lipo, and even the laser scar reduction options that most of which are only available at Obi Plastic Surgery one of the most advanced and equipped plastic surgery centers in the United States.
#VECTRA 3D IMAGING LOGO SOFTWARE#
Obi’s other video and photography equipment allows a patient to preview their results for all types of plastic surgery procedures:Īt Obi Plastic Surgery, you will experience some of the most advanced imaging equipment and 3D imaging software available in Northeast Florida. The Vectra XT 3D Imaging system is not just for Breast Surgery. The Vectra XT 3D Imaging system now makes this possible. And being able to both view from any angle and adjust any aspect of that virtual image of yourself into the exact shape you wish to achieve. Imagine being able to work with your plastic surgeon using a 3D view of you, not a simulated human mock up, but you, right down to the last freckle and birthmark. These are important considerations when using this technology in surgical planning.The most common fear women have when considering breast augmentation or reconstruction is the fear of not being able to effectively communicate their wishes and goals to their plastic surgeon and as a result, not achieving the results they wanted and expected. The present study suggests that the reliability of Vectra in predicting breast mass varies across cup sizes and that there exists a significantly decreased association between VPM and MM among pseudoptotic breasts. No other system is as feature rich or even comes close to matching image quality and accuracy. Comparison of correlation coefficients for ptosis and BMI categories revealed a significantly reduced correlation coefficient for pseudoptosis (0.90 vs 0.75, P = 0.0425). Canfields VECTRA® 3D face and body imaging system with Sculptors amazing modeling tools sets the standard for 3D imaging. The Bartlett test indicated that VPM varies significantly across cup sizes (P < 0.0001). Using this system, we take a three-dimensional (3D) photograph of the patient prior to surgery. The following equation was derived to predict MM: = 0.8 × + 32 (adjusted r = 0.81). Mancoll Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery is the only practice in the area that uses the advanced VECTRA 3D imaging system to provide our patients with the most complete education possible regarding their plastic surgery procedures. There was a strong correlation between MM and VPM (R = 0.90, P < 0.0001). Significance was set at α = 0.05, and analyses were conducted in R 3.6.0, version 1.70. Correlation coefficients calculated for ptosis and BMI categories were then compared with the overall correlation coefficient. Equality of variances was assessed with the Bartlett test. The Vectra 3D H2 is an entirely self-contained solution with a unique and innovative raised flash. Visualize your hopes and expectations with the Vectra 3D H2 imaging technology. Correlation between MM and VPM was evaluated using 2-tailed Pearson correlation coefficients (r), and associated formula was derived from a linear model. In addition, a 3D facial analysis can be run to see where brown spots are, wrinkles, texture, pores, and red areas. Cup size was approximated as follows: A and smaller (MM ≤250 g), B (250 g < MM ≤ 450 g), C (450 g < MM ≤ 600 g), and D and larger (MM ≥ 600 g). Body mass index was classified as follows: underweight (BMI < 20 kg/m), normal (20 kg/m ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m), overweight (25 kg/m ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m). Variables recorded included Vectra predicted mass (VPM in grams), mastectomy mass (MM in grams), ptosis grade, and body mass index (BMI). Thus, the present study analyzes the reliability of the Vectra 3D Imaging System in predicting breast mass and explores potential confounding variables that may limit its accuracy.Ī retrospective review of 202 breasts that received direct-to-implant reconstruction by a single surgeon between February 2015 and February 2019 was conducted. Although the introduction of 3-dimensional imaging modalities has further improved preoperative planning, they require in-depth analysis of accuracy if they are to be considered as a standardized part of preoperative planning. In selecting breast implants for breast reconstruction, current preoperative planning largely relies on 2-dimensional measurements, which are often limited in suboptimal accuracy and objectivity.